On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 03:16:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:29:31AM +0200, Herbert Rosmanith wrote:
(...)
> > alessandro suardi told me that this problem is solved using the
> > patch from:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.4-seg-4.patch
> >
> > which are dated from march (2005-03-27) and therefore, about 3 months
> > old.
> >
> > it's about time this gets into the official kernel. who is in charge
> > of it? (it's obviously not sufficient to report to lkml).
>
> Looks OK except that one "movl" conversion was forgotten in
> the x86-64 diff:
>
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
> }
> {
> unsigned gsindex;
> - asm volatile("movl %%gs,%0" : "=g" (gsindex));
> + asm volatile("movl %%gs,%0" : "=r" (gsindex));
> if (unlikely((gsindex | next->gsindex) || prev->gs)) {
>
> Who wrote the patch?
I believe it's H.J. Lu (CC'd).
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
