On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 07:51 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > __plist_del was a good fix. I attached a patch on "Plist cleanup on RT" to
> > lkml with what was acceptable to me. A good 60% of Thomas's changes are
> > unacceptable to me.
>
> Would you be so kind to explain that a bit ? Your patch contains _all_
> my proposed changes except the additional plist_first_entry macro and
> the comment cleanup.
>
> So what are the 60% which are unacceptable. Comments ? I'm amused.
Whatever was missing was unacceptable.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
