Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Esben Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:

> [...] In extreme load situations we could end up with a lot of waiters 
> on mmap_sem forinstance.

what do you mean by extreme load. Extreme number of RT tasks, or extreme 
number of tasks altogether? The sorted-list implementation i had in -RT 
had all non-RT tasks handled in an O(1) way - the O(N) component was for 
adding RT tasks (removal was O(1)).

so the question is - can we have an extreme (larger than 140) number of 
RT tasks? If yes, why are they all RT - they can have no expectation of 
good latencies with a possible load factor of 140!

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux