On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> >I'd prefer this to be:
> >
> > printk(KERN_INFO "%s: %s %s %dKiB%s\n",
> > md->disk->disk_name, mmc_card_id(card), mmc_card_name(card),
> > (card->csd.capacity << card->csd.read_blkbits) / 1024,
> > card->csd.cmdclass & CCC_BLOCK_WRITE ? "" : " (ro)");
> >
> >
> >
>
> I'd rather not since the SD patches have a similar test but on a
> different condition.
That's just a case of adding another %s and ?:. I'd really prefer it
to be done this way.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]