Re: 2.6.12?

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Subject: Double free of initramfs
> 
> Is there a patch to fix this?  I've noticed a solid lockup when trying to
> umount initramfs after a pivot_root.

Nope, but there's a design:




Begin forwarded message:

Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:49:32 +0000
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: linux-arch@vger
Subject: Double free of initramfs


In all linker scripts we currently have something like this:

  __init_begin = .;
 ...
   . = ALIGN(4096);
  __initramfs_start = .;
  .init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
  __initramfs_end = .;
  ...
  __init_end = .;

It seems all 25 linker scripts in the current bk tree are suffering from
this.  Which mean with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD enabled first free_initrd_mem
may be called to free the initram disk and just a little later
free_initmem will try to free the entire range again, so either the
linker scripts would need fixing or free_initrd_mem has become obsolete.

  Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/