Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.

> > [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
>
> Which of these patches are considered to be 2.6.12 material?

All the patches are pretty short but if I had to choose I'd say
at least the following 4 patches should go into 2.6.12:

[patch 3/11] s390: ptrace peek and poke.
[patch 4/11] s390: uml ptrace fixes.
[patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic.
[patch 9/11] s390: deadlock in appldata.

blue skies,
   Martin

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic.
Next by Date: Re: [patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic.
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
Next by thread: [patch 4/11] s390: uml ptrace fixes.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]