Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.

> > [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
>
> Which of these patches are considered to be 2.6.12 material?

All the patches are pretty short but if I had to choose I'd say
at least the following 4 patches should go into 2.6.12:

[patch 3/11] s390: ptrace peek and poke.
[patch 4/11] s390: uml ptrace fixes.
[patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic.
[patch 9/11] s390: deadlock in appldata.

blue skies,
   Martin

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic.
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic.
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
• Next by thread: [patch 4/11] s390: uml ptrace fixes.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]