On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:27 +0000, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > If you grab Linus' current tree it should apply.
> >
> > Sorry about the confusion.
> > -john
>
> I ignored the reject since it was from an #include section - the build
> went fine. I am even able to use it successfully. Couple things -
Good to hear.
> Very happy to report that I no longer get those annoying - "losing
> some ticks ..." "your time source is unreliable or some driver is
> hogging interrupts" messages - Not sure what change in TOD subsystem
> cured it - or was it just the removal of the printk? ;)
Since we do not interpolate, lost ticks no longer cause time problems
(well, unless you're using the jiffies timesource).
> Sadly, it somehow feels noticeably slower than vanilla 2.6.12-rc5.
> Especially using X/KDE - It is surely usable but not snappy. I will do
> more research to find out exactly why - but before that is such as
> loss of snappiness possible due to the TOD changes?
Could you send me your dmesg output with and without using my patch? It
could be you're using a different timesource.
thanks
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
