Pavel Machek wrote:
> Anyway, it should not be arch-dependend. We need one good mechanism of
> notifying userland, not one per architecture.
Yes.
>> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events,
>> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that
>> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as
>> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly.
>
> Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too?
No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of
notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep
it alive.
--
Stefan Seyfried
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
