Re: [PATCH 1/3] eCryptfs: eCryptfs kernel module

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:32:19AM -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> What sort of
> logical chunks would you consider to be appropriate?  Separate patches
> for each file (inode.c, file.c, super.c, etc.), which represent sets
> of functions for each major VFS object?

Yes.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] eCryptfs: eCryptfs kernel module
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] eCryptfs: eCryptfs kernel module
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] eCryptfs: eCryptfs kernel module
    • From: Michael Halcrow <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] eCryptfs: eCryptfs kernel module
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] SAS domain layout for Linux sysfs
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] eCryptfs: eCryptfs kernel module
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] eCryptfs: eCryptfs kernel module
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]