Hi Greg,
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 21:51 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:06:55AM -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> > * Greg KH <[email protected]> [2005-05-31 16:32:15 -0700]:
> > > This code is _very_ close to just a copy of the i2c core code. Why
> > > duplicate it and not work with the i2c people instead?
> >
> > It was discussed briefly on the lm-sensors mailing list [1]. I didn't
> > reply at the time, but I do agree that SPI and I2C/SMBus are different
> > enough to warrant independent subsystems.
>
> Independant is fine. But direct copies, including making the same
> mistakes (i2c dev interface, i2c driver model mess) isn't :)
I have also worked on a(nother) SPI layer implementation. Like Dmitry, I
ended up following closely the i2c implementation, so, I'm curious to
know more details on what you call "i2c driver model mess".
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thanks,
Rui
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
