Paul Jakma napisał(a): > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Lukasz Stelmach wrote: > >> I prefere, and I do it, explicit asking for a CC. > > > No need - set a Reply-To to point back at the list. > > Reply-To isn't ideal, primarily because of dumb MUAs, but it works. > There ought to be a better way to indicate this preference, but there > isn't unfortunately. CC is muc better From: someone@unsubscribed To: mailing-list CC: someone@unsubscribed Reply-To: mailing-list From: someone@subscribed To: mailing-list CC: [email protected] Reply-To: mailing-list From: someone@subscribed To: mailing-list Reply-To: mailing-list When we use Reply All to answer all of this messages we get quit a senisble behavior. Far more sensible than answering to the list and personally to everyone. >> And direct replying generates more traffic. > > ROFL. Direct replies are miniscule compared to regular list traffic > which itself is less than the traffic generated by spam. Does it mean that we shoudn't try conserve the bandwidth just because there is spam? -- Było mi bardzo miło. Trzecia pospolita klęska, [...] >Łukasz< Już nie katolicka lecz złodziejska. (c)PP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- [OT] mailing list management
- From: Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Paul Jakma <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Paul Jakma <[email protected]>
- [OT] mailing list management
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux for Mobile phones and PDAs [long]
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] SPI core
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Index(es):
 |