Hi!
> > > > swsusp1 should not need any special casing of sync, right? We can
> > > > simply do sys_sync(), then freeze, or something like that. We could
> > > > even remove sys_sync() completely; it is not needed for correctness.
>
> Wrong. I guess you're only trying it on a machine that isn't actually
> doing anything :). I've forgotten whether it was this freezer
> implementation or the last, but we've been testing freezing processes
> when the load average exceeds 100. If you have a thread that is syncing
> and another that's submitting I/O continually (think dd, for example),
> you want this.
If sys_sync() is not working, *fix sys_sync()*. [BTW I see that
problem before and I think it is being worked on.] I'm *not* going to
work around it in refrigerator.
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
