Jim Crilly wrote:
On 06/01/05 07:50:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Jim Crilly" <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't use cdda2wav so I can't comment, but every other ripping tool that
I've used on Linux has had no problem using the /dev/whatever interface, so
once again it appears that your tool is the blacksheep for no good reason.
You should use it as it is even used by people on Win32 because it is the
best DAE program for even badly readable sources.
I'm not an audiophile, I can't tell the difference between a mp3 encoded at
128k and one encoded at 160k so I really doubt I could tell the difference
between what cdda2wav and what most other DAE programs would produce. So
given that the quality of the rips will be effectively equal to my ears,
I'll use whatever's most convenient.
The "quality" or fidelity isn't the issue here, but rather the rip being
deterministic and producing the same (as as often as possible, correct)
data. Joerg used the "paranoia" library to do the ripping validation,
and I'm unconvinced that there is anything better in that regard.
The device names are totally another issue, which I'm not ready to drag
around the block yet again.
--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
