Re: [PATCH] Sample fix for hyperthread exploit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:06, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Comments?
>
> I don't think it's really worth it, but if you go this way I'd rather do
> this via a prctl() so that apps can tell the kernel "I'd like to run
> exclusive on a core". That'd be much better than blindly isolating all
> applications.

I agree, and this is where we (could) implement the core isolation. I'm still 
under the impression (as you appear to be) that this theoretical exploit is 
not worth trying to work around.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux