Måns Rullgård napisał(a): >>I suggest >>(re)placing any Reply-To headers in incoming letters with Reply-To: >>linux-kernel@... before delivering them to subscribers. > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html That is quite a biased view due to a disaster the author mentions at the end. Yes, I must admit that there are some points he *might* be right. Nonetheles I wouldn't concider the drawbacks harmful in case of LKML. > Use "reply all", "wide reply", or whatever mozilla thunderbird, which > you appear to be using, calls it. As I stated somewhere befor this is an option but it also adds the author of the original message to the list of recipients thus making one receive the same letter twice. Does anyone know of any TB extension that implements reply-to-group button? Best regards. -- Było mi bardzo miło. Trzecia pospolita klęska, [...] >Łukasz< Już nie katolicka lecz złodziejska. (c)PP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: MadMike <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- References:
- [OT] mailing list management
- From: Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>
- [OT] mailing list management
- Prev by Date: Re: Again: UML on s390 (31Bit)
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Index(es):