On Wed, 2005-06-01 12:31:50 +0200, Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]> wrote: > Jan-Benedict Glaw napisał(a): > > >> I suggest > >>(re)placing any Reply-To headers in incoming letters with Reply-To: > >>linux-kernel@... before delivering them to subscribers. > > > > > This is considered harmful. > > Could you explain your point of view. I am subscribed to a list wher > such a thing gets done and I haven't noticed any injures ;-) http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Please just configure your email client > > correctly. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > That is? > > Well I might use "Reply to all" but then for example you would receive > two copies of this email. One in your private inbox and the other in the > list's box. Is this correct? Reply-to-List is an option. For the LKML, it's even better to do a group reply. This may allow the other party to answer in a fast manner, not waiting for a delayed LKML email... > I would even suggest placing real name in the reply to field next to > list's address. That's considered standard. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- [OT] mailing list management
- From: Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]>
- [OT] mailing list management
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Index(es):
 |