Re: [PATCH] Abstracted Priority Inheritance for RT

* Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've abstracted priority inheritance from the RT patch. I created pi.h 
> and pi.c that can be used by other structures that need priority 
> inheritance. I also added a config option CONFIG_PRIORITY_INHERITANCE 
> so that PI can be turned off . This could also be made completely 
> separate from the RT patch.

i'd rather not slow things down by callbacks and other abstraction 
before seeing how things want to integrate in fact. Do we really need 
the callbacks?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Abstracted Priority Inheritance for RT
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Abstracted Priority Inheritance for RT
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Fix list scanning in __cleanup_transaction
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Abstracted Priority Inheritance for RT
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Abstracted Priority Inheritance for RT
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]