Re: RT patch acceptance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
> This is really interesting code. It's really not unlike what preempt RT
> is already doing with the atomic locking (replacement). From the looks
> of it conversion of an ethernet driver to be RT capable is shockingly
> trivial.

It is. In some cases you need to provide alternate functions, but in
most not ... However, note that this is for UDP. There is no such
thing as deterministic TCP.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux