On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:22:44PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> Does this patch make sense?
>...
> --- linux-vanilla/include/linux/acpi.h 2005-05-28 02:59:59.000000000 +0400
> +++ linux-8250/include/linux/acpi.h 2005-05-28 03:39:25.000000000 +0400
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
> #ifndef _LINUX_ACPI_H
> #define _LINUX_ACPI_H
>
> +#include <linux/config.h>
> +
>...
Len said one month ago that he applied a patch from me that included
both this change and a similar one in acpi_bus.h .
Are there any problems with getting recent ACPI code into -mm?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
