Re: [PATCH] fixes the warnings obtained with arm-elf-gcc 3.4

[randy_dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Tue, 31 May 2005 16:22:40 +0530 Ashutosh Naik wrote:

| Sorry for the repeating mails
| 
| This patch fixes the warnings obtained with arm-elf-gcc 3.4.
| 
| Files Affected -
| 
| -fs/jffs2/read.c
| -fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
| -fs/jffs2/readinode.c
| -fs/jffs2/write.c
| -fs/jffs2/gc.c
| -fs/jffs2/erase.c
| -fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c
| -fs/nfs/nfs3xdr.c
| -drivers/base/dmapool.c
| -drivers/char/random.c
| -drivers/serial/8250_early.c
| -net/core/dev.c
| -net/sunrpc/xprt.c
| -net/sunrpc/svc.c
| -net/sunrpv/svcsock.c
| 
| Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Naik <ashutosh.naik@gmail.com>

These patches seem to be against plain 2.6.11, is that right?

Hint:  They don't apply cleanly to 2.6.12-rc5.  You should send
patches that apply cleanly to the latest mainline kernel version,
which is currently 2.6.12-rc5, or even better, patches to
2.6.12-rc5-git5 (or linux-git-current).


Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/base/dmapool.c.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/char/random.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/serial/8250_early.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/gc.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/read.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/readinode.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/write.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/nfs/nfs3xdr.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file net/core/dev.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sunrpc/svc.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sunrpc/svcsock.c.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sunrpc/xprt.c.rej


---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/