On Sat, 28 May 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005, Bill Huey wrote:
>
> > > It isn't clear to me yet. I'm sure you can make your interrupt
> > > latencies look good, as with your scheduling latencies. But when
> >
> > My project was getting a solid spike at 4 usec for irq-thread
> > startups and Ingo's stuff is better. It's already there.
>
> Is that worst case?
So is that some sort of observable worst case value with a suitable
stress test load? You didn't answer this in your reply. I'll be setting up
my own test system soon to have a better look.
Thanks,
Zwane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
