On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:46:13PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> And this patch will break balance-on-fork.
Right :-)
> How about conditionally setting task_cpu if the task's current
> CPU is offline?
Something like this?
--- kernel/fork.c.org 2005-05-31 14:57:15.000000000 +0530
+++ kernel/fork.c 2005-05-31 16:06:41.000000000 +0530
@@ -1024,7 +1024,8 @@ static task_t *copy_process(unsigned lon
* parent's CPU). This avoids alot of nasty races.
*/
p->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
- if (unlikely(!cpu_isset(task_cpu(p), p->cpus_allowed)))
+ if (unlikely(!cpu_isset(task_cpu(p), p->cpus_allowed) ||
+ !cpu_online(task_cpu(p))))
set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
/*
--
Thanks and Regards,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore, INDIA - 560017
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]