Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page

> Thus with "normal" page clear and "nt" page copy routines
> both clear and copy benchmarks run faster than with
> stock kernel, both with small and large working set.
> 
> Am I wrong?

fork is only a corner case. The main case is a process allocating
memory using brk/mmap and then using it.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
    • From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
    • From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/1] kconfig: trivial cleanup
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]