On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 22:06 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > No, *you're* the one misunderstanding. > > Since *everything* is preemptible except a few known code paths whose > execution times determine the maximum possible latency from interrupt to > running the highest priority user process. Sorry. Should read: *Everything* is preemptible except a few known code paths, whose execution times determine the maximum possible latency from interrupt to running the highest priority user process. But, you'd know that, if you'd followed the development in the slightest bit. And, I think Ingo knows what "determinism" and "hard realtime" mean. I suggest you reread his posts. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
- Prev by Date: Re: RT patch acceptance
- Next by Date: Re: question : 802.11b WLAN stack in linux
- Previous by thread: Re: RT patch acceptance
- Next by thread: Re: RT patch acceptance
- Index(es):