Re: RT patch acceptance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 19:15 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Sure, but like Andi said, general increased responsiveness is not exclusive
> to PREEMPT_RT, and any effort to reduce latency is welcome.

Nobody denies that, but thats no argument against a RT extension.

> But wasn't the same said about the existing preemption code? Yet, most
> distros ship with it disabled and some developers still feel that there
> are no added benefits. 

One of the most disgusting arguments in this thread is "distros do XYZ".

There is a lot of Linux beyond distros. 

tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux