On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 19:15 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Sure, but like Andi said, general increased responsiveness is not exclusive
> to PREEMPT_RT, and any effort to reduce latency is welcome.
Nobody denies that, but thats no argument against a RT extension.
> But wasn't the same said about the existing preemption code? Yet, most
> distros ship with it disabled and some developers still feel that there
> are no added benefits.
One of the most disgusting arguments in this thread is "distros do XYZ".
There is a lot of Linux beyond distros.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
