On Monday 30 May 2005 4:09 pm, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2005 00:55 schrieb David Brownell:
> > The logic closing an open usbfs file -- which is done before any task
> > exits with such an open file -- is supposed to block till all its URBs
> > complete. So the pointer to the task "should" be valid for as long as
> > any URB it's submitted is active.
>
> What happens if you pass such an fd through a socket?
Why I suppose then you might find glitches in the design underlying
the usbfs code. I put "should" in scare-quotes for a reason.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
