On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 07:03:55PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> :) seriously, though, I can't believe we've discouraged you because
> we're very poor at website design. Surely after all that's been said
Yes you have.
> about the nanokernel approach you'd want to at least dedicate some
> short amount of time for downloading the code and at least running
> a diffstat on it or something ... or even better, giving it a test
> ride. Philippe has even gone as far as providing patches providing
> both PREEMPT_RT and Adeos under the same roof ... it doesn't get
> much better than that ...
When your random 10 second email post recently gives a more direct
pointer to the information I need or find interesting, then you know
your web site has serious problems. None of those papers are on a
top level link that can be easily accessed. The papers you folks do
are the best documentation outlining your work yet they are the most
difficult to find. That's a serious mistake.
Your sporatic posting on lkml are more informative than the web site.
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
