Re: [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 00/06] blk: barrier flushing reimplementation

[Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>]

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, May 29 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 29 2005, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > > Hello, guys.
> > >
> > > This patchset is reimplementation of QUEUE_ORDERED_FLUSH feature.  It
> > > doens't update API docs yet.  If it's determined that this patchset
> > > can go in, I'll regenerate this patchset with doc updates (sans the
> > > last debug message patch of course).
> >
> > Awesome work, that's really the last step in getting the barrier code
> > fully unified and working with tags. I'll review your patchset tomorrow.
>
>
> Patches look nice, this is a good step forward. If you feel like doing a
> little more work in this area, I would very much like to add
> QUEUE_ORDERED_FUA as a third method for implementing barriers. Basically
> it would use the FUA commands to put data safely on disk, instead of
> using the post flushes.
>
> For NCQ, we have a FUA bit in the FPDMA commands. For non-ncq, we have
> the various WRITE_DMA_EXT_FUA (and similar). It would be identical to
> ORDERED_FLUSH in that we let the queue drain, issue a pre-flush, and
> then a write with FUA set. It would eliminate the need to issue an extra
> flush at the end, cutting down the required commands for writing a
> barrier from 3 to 2.

 Hi, Jens.

 I'm on it.

 Thanks.

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/