Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc4-V0.7.47-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
agreed - i've added your patch to my tree.

with a small modification: i turned the error into a link-time error, because gcc parses both branches and will give a compiler-time warning even if the proper compat_semaphore is used.

Oh, sorry. I actually had it produce a link-time error at first. But I wanted so much to make it fail at compile time that I screwed it up and didn't test both cases.

However, what you have in RT-V0.7.47-13 is still not correct. Now it again produces only a warning :-) Patch attached. This time I really tested it in both cases. For struct semaphore it fails at link-time. For struct compat_semaphore it compiles without problems.

Michal
diff -Nurp -X linux-RT/Documentation/dontdiff linux-RT/include/linux/rt_lock.h linux-RT.mich/include/linux/rt_lock.h
--- linux-RT/include/linux/rt_lock.h	2005-05-30 18:40:07.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-RT.mich/include/linux/rt_lock.h	2005-05-30 18:29:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ extern void there_is_no_init_MUTEX_LOCKE
  * No locked initialization for RT semaphores
  */
 #define rt_init_MUTEX_LOCKED(sem) \
-		there_is_no_init_MUTEX_LOCKED_for_RT_semaphores
+		there_is_no_init_MUTEX_LOCKED_for_RT_semaphores()
 extern void FASTCALL(rt_down(struct semaphore *sem));
 extern int FASTCALL(rt_down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem));
 extern int FASTCALL(rt_down_trylock(struct semaphore *sem));

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux