Re: spinaphore conceptual draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: spinaphore conceptual draft
From: Chris Friesen <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 08:52:13 -0600
Cc: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>, john cooper <[email protected]>, [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115

Andi Kleen wrote:

On many architectures (including popular ones like AMD x86-64)there is no reliable fast monotonic (1) count unfortunately


What about rdtsc?

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: spinaphore conceptual draft
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- spinaphore conceptual draft (was discussion of RT patch)
  - From: David Nicol <[email protected]>
- Re: spinaphore conceptual draft (was discussion of RT patch)
  - From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: spinaphore conceptual draft
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: RT and Cascade interrupts
Next by Date: Re: Possible GPL Violation
Previous by thread: Re: spinaphore conceptual draft
Next by thread: Re: spinaphore conceptual draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux