kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
When I was told to analyze whether linux is suitable for our
needs, any nanokernel or two-OS approaches were excluded from the
beginning: Mgmt thought that due to their nature and complexity,
such approaches are not able to offer any improvements w.r.t. what
we have now. Clearly, "one system and one source" is wanted!
You don't explain how making the Linux kernel hard-RT
will be so much simpler and more supportable!
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
