On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:43:30PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> If you are talking about soft-RT, or things running on Linux today,
> then sure they'll keep working. Even some or all of PREEMPT_RT may
> be merged into the Linux guest too, for better soft-RT. I haven't
> been arguing against that.
Hard RT guarantee are very possible, not in years, but months (possibly
already) under constraints previously outlined.
[dual complexity issues snippeted]
> I agree we'll never have a fully functional hard-RT Linux kernel.
> But this thread hasn't been about whether or not the RT task knows
> what it is doing (we assume it does), but the possibility of making
> more parts of the kernel able to provide some RT guarantee (ie. so
> said RT task *can* use more functionality).
No sane RT app person is going to call into the kernel and expect
guarantees in a general purpose system. Folks doing this kind of
RT work will have at least a path that they can follow to *possibly*
make this happen. It's all conjecture at the moment and it won't be
known until somebody takes a shot at it and all associated kernel
issues. It's most definitely a worthy project.
If this happens Linux would be an ideal kernel for digital video
recorders and such.
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
