On Fri, 27 May 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 27 May 2005, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > >
> > > Okay, sorry for this small bug. I'll recreate the ALSA git tree with
> > > proper comments again. Also, the author is not correct (should be taken
> > > from the first Signed-off-by:).
> >
> > Hmm.. That's not always true in general, since Sign-off does allow to sign
> > off on other peoples patches (see the "(b)" clause in DCO), but maybe in
> > the ALSA tree it is.
>
> Yes, I'll occasionally do patches which were written by "A" as:
>
> From: A
> ...
> Signed-off-by: B
>
> And that comes through email as:
>
>
> ...
> From: <[email protected]>
> ...
> From: A
> ...
> Signed-off-by: B
>
>
> which means that the algorithm for identifying the author is "the final
> From:".
>
> I guess the bug here is the use of From: to identify the primary author,
> because transporting the patch via email adds ambiguity.
>
> Maybe we should introduce "^Author:"?
>
That might be good. I honestly don't know what would be the best
solution, but what happens often at the moment is that patches get passed
on as "From" whatever maintainer (or random resender) happened to pass it
on to Andrew/Linus and that person then effectively gets labeled as the
author of the patch in the changelogs/git/whatever. That's not perfect...
Author: might solve it.. worth a shot if you ask me..
--
Jesper Juhl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
