> Yes, as Ingo stated many times, addition cond_resched() to
> might_sleep() does achieve the "usable" latencies -- and obviously
> that's hacky.
>
> So, the only question is whether changing (inserting) cond_resched()
> to all points would be acceptable even if it results in a big amount
> of changes...
Or change (almost) all calls to might_sleep() into calls to
cond_reched(), and put a might_sleep() inside cond_reched().
Ciao,
D.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
