* Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> AFAIK the kernel has quite regressed recently, but that was not true
> (for reasonable sound) at least for some earlier 2.6 kernels and some
> of the low latency patchkit 2.4 kernels.
(putting my scheduler maintainer hat on) was this under a stock !PREEMPT
kernel? If you can reproduce it personally, could you try the
PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY option available in 2.6.12-rc5-mm1? [Despite its name
it only adds cond_resched()s, not any heavier preempt mechanism.]
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
