Re: 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?

On Fri, 27 May 2005, Mikael Pettersson wrote:

> The only issue AFAIK is that assemblers may only
> recognise the plain base-10 AAD syntax. No biggie.

 And actually gas has supported the explicit operand variations for "aad" 
and "aam" for a long time now.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?
  - From: <[email protected]>
- Re: 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?
  - From: Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: RT patch acceptance
Next by Date: Resend: PATCH: Stop 2.6.12rc rmmod from being able to destroy CD hardware
Previous by thread: Re: 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?
Next by thread: Re: 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]