Re: waitid() fails with EINVAL for SA_RESTART signals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 26 May 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> > Other machines are subject to the same risk and should have a
> > prevent_tail_call definition too.  The asm-i386/linkage.h version probably
> > works fine for every machine.  It might as well be generic, I'd say.
> 
> Sparc, for one, doesn't need it.  We pass the pt_regs in via a pointer
> to the trap level stack frame which won't be released by a tail-call
> in C code.

x86 has largely tried to move in that direction too, ie a lot of the 
asm-calls have been turned into FASTCALL() with %eax pointing to the 
stack.

Roland, I applied the patch, but if there was some particular case that 
triggered this, maybe it's worth trying to re-write that one.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux