Dinakar wrote:
> This was the same problem that I had reported earlier
> and fixed as well
You're right. I even signed off on your change.
Andrew,
Drop my "cpuset rmdir scheduling while atomic fix" patch.
Dinakar's dynamic-sched-domains-cpuset-changes.patch fixed it.
Dinakar's change wasn't quite the same as mine. It is actually the
better of the two - it reduces the dentry spinlock region, instead of
moving the cpuset_sem region outside the spinlock. I just ran my stress
test that shows this bug. Dinakar's fix is fine, as expected.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
