On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:45:05PM -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> Could I get an historical (2.4 & Distribution) perspective on this. At
> which point, or what code/include/manifest/version delineating it, would
> you say the driver is no longer, if ever, required to place a lock
> (host_lock or io_request_lock) around the scsi_done call?
>
> I expect (or hope) the answer to be: always needs io_request_lock in
> 2.4, never needed the host_lock in 2.5+.
You don't need any lock in 2.4 either.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
