On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 17:59 -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:45:13PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > I think some of it is volatile still, but there are plenty of pieces
> > that could go in now. Threaded interrupts is up for discussion, this is
> > the reason why I started the thread. People appear to have specific
> > objections to that feature, which are still not clear.
> >
> > Whole patch, no, small chunks yes.
>
> You should have CCed Andrew originally.
He was CC'd on the very first email. It could be that he isn't going to
get involved cause Ingo already said he's not submitting anything ..
> All objections I've seen so far have been vague, from folks that
> don't/or refuse to understand the fundamentals of how this patch
> works nor has tracked the development of it carefully. Until
> specific questions and objections are articulated, nothing can be
> addressed at this time. I'm biased to ignoring all talk until
> then.
I'm not going to ignore any of the discussion, but it would be nice to
hear Andrew's, or Linus's specific objections..
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
