On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 01:21 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> IIRC, the reason (when you wrote the code) was that you didn't
> want to enable preempt either because of binary compatibility, or
> because of bugs? Well I think the bug issue is no more since your
> debug patches went in, and the compatibility reason may be a fine
> one for a distro kernel, but not a kernel.org one.
I can't imagine binary compatibility having been a reason. At least for
the RH distros it really isn't kernel wise. At All.
PREEMPT was (and is?) a stability risk and so you'll see RHEL4 not
having it enabled. But it has nothing to do with in-kernel binary
compatibility; that just doesn't exist, kernel.org or distro alike.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
