Re: New revision of promise TX4

[Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>]

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 15:41 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I recently bought a TX-4 which seems to be using a new chip (PCI ID: 
> 105A:3519).
> 
> It was not supported by the kernel so i added those lines to promise_sata.c
> 
> diff sata_promise.c /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.9/drivers/scsi/sata_promise.c
> 170,171d169
> <       { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3519, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0,
> <         board_20319 },
> 
> 
> Is it the 'right' way?

if it works.. almost
the "right" way is to use "diff -purN" instead of just plain diff (it's
custom) and to do the files the other way around (again custom). 

If you want to make it nice you add a PCI_ID_... constant for 0x3519 to
the header and use the symbolic constant in your code instead.

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/