On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 06:25:05PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> 9 point releases is nowhere long enough. This removal needs to wait for
>> similar amounts of time as other removed interfaces (c.f. devfs, which
>> is far more offensive).
>> In general there are staging rules for this sort of affair, and although
>> I'm no expert in their fine points, nor can I even say what the exact
>> criteria are, but it's rather clear in this instance it's over the line.
>> I suspect a major release, planned as a staging ground for things like
>> e.g. this and removing devfs, would be the most appropriate time for it.
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:41:10AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The current rules are simply "put it for 6-12 months in
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt and remove it then".
> 2.6.3 is more than a year go, and the date when the raw driver was
> declared obsolete predates the introduction of
> feature-removal-schedule.txt (at that time, we were still in the belief
> a 2.7 kernel would come some day).
This sounds a little shaky but I'll let someone higher up roll dice or
whatever to decide.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
