On Fri, 20 May 2005, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> Christoph, I'm getting the following errors building rc4-mm2 w/ GCC 2.95.4:
Works fine here with gcc 2.95.4.ds15-22 but that is a debian gcc
2.95.4 patched up to work correctly. If you need to address the pathology in pristine
gcc 2.95.4 by changing the source then declare the entry field with 0
members.
Index: linux-2.6.12-rc4/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.12-rc4.orig/mm/slab.c 2005-05-19 21:29:45.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc4/mm/slab.c 2005-05-20 19:18:22.000000000 +0000
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
spinlock_t lock;
#endif
- void *entry[];
+ void *entry[0];
};
/* bootstrap: The caches do not work without cpuarrays anymore,
gcc 2.95 can produce proper code for ppc64?
> mm/slab.c:281: field `entry' has incomplete typemm/slab.c: In function
> 'cache_alloc_refill':
See patch above?
> mm/slab.c:2497: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
That is the end of cache_alloc_debug_check right? This is a void
function in my source.
> mm/slab.c: In function `kmem_cache_alloc':
> mm/slab.c:2567: warning: `objp' might be used uninitialized in this function
> mm/slab.c: In function `kmem_cache_alloc_node':
> mm/slab.c:2567: warning: `objp' might be used uninitialized in this function
> mm/slab.c: In function `__kmalloc':
> mm/slab.c:2567: warning: `objp' might be used uninitialized in this function
There is a branch there and the object is initialized in either branch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
