> George Anzinger <[email protected]> writes:
>> Andi Kleen wrote: ~>
>> If you do a new structure for this I would suggest adding a
>> "precision" field (or the same with a different name). Basically
>> ....
> I think the accepted and standard way to do this is to use different
> "clock"s. For example, in the HRT patch the clocks
> CLOCK_REALTIME_HR and CLOCK_MONOTONIC_HR are defined as high
> resolution clocks.
Andi, what is the kind of usage patterns you were envisioning? Do you
know of anyone that would have kind of a hard requirement for doing it
like you suggested?
George's argument makes sense to me, but I wonder if the audio people
would have a rationale against it?
--
Inaky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
