Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [RFT PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dinakar wrote:
> I tried your script and see that it makes absolutely no impact on top.
> The CPU on which it is running is mostly 100% idle. However I'll run
> more tests to confirm that it has no impact

I have no particular intuition, one way or the other, on how much a
dynamic reallocation of sched domains will impact the system.  So
once you are comfortable that this is not normally a problem (which
you might already be), don't worry about it further on my account.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux