On Fri, 13 May 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
> > This is not a kernel problem, but a user space problem. The fix
> > is to change the user space crypto code to need the same number of cache line
> > accesses on all keys.
>
> You actually also need to hit the same cache line sequence on all keys
> if you take a bit more care about it.
>
> > Disabling HT for this would the totally wrong approach, like throwing
> > out the baby with the bath water.
>
> HT for most users is pretty irrelevant, its a neat idea but the
> benchmarks don't suggest its too big a hit
This is one of those things which can give any result depending on the
measurement. For kernel compiles I might see a 5-30% reduction in clock
time, for threaded applications like web/mail/news not much, and for
applications which communicate via shared memory up to 50% because some
blocking system calls can be avoided and cache impact is lower.
In general I have to agree with the "too big," but I haven't seen any
indication that the hole can be exploited without being able to run a
custom application on the machine, so for single users machines and
servers the risk level seems low.
--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
