Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process

Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It all looks a bit fast-and-loose.  If there are significant performance
> > benefits and these issues are loudly commented (they aren't at present)
> > then maybe-OK, I guess.
> 
> There are significant performance benefits in particular for one standard 
> NUMA benchmark that keeps calling sys_times over and over. I believe other 
> programs may exhibit the same brain dead behavior.


hrm, OK.  Please redo the patch with nice comments which explain what's
going on and why the end result is correct and safe, thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
• Next by Date: Re: Reproducible 2.6.11.9 NFS Kernel Crashing Bug!
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]