Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 May 2005, Matthew Dobson wrote:

> Not a big fan of this patch.  It's not wrong, per-se, but it just doesn't
> sit right with me.  asm-generic/topology.h should be a fallback file for
> the arches that just want some sort of sane UP/SMP defaults.  The better
> (IMHO) solution is this patch.  Builds fine on PPC64.

And what happens if yet another function needs to be added for all arches? 
Then ppc64 will break again and you will fix it again?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux