On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 18:52 +0200, Grégoire Favre wrote: > I just did some copy, and I didn't swap hardware ??? > > What does that mean ? I think the bug report that Andrew forwarded to linux-scsi with the above Subject: is from [email protected] (at least, his information matches the trace). James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix root hole in pktcdvd
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Factor in buddy allocator alignment requirements in node memory alignment
- Previous by thread: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Next by thread: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Index(es):
 |